Die Zeit heilt nicht die Wunden.

This IS a feminism blog, male entitlement / MRA bullshit will not be tolerated here.
"Das Wesen der Schönheit sei die Harmonie zwischen sinnlichen Trieb und dem Gesetz der Vernunft." -Friedrich Schiller (1759-1805).

Juli 30

Bedtime now, good night



courtneylovedcobain:

do you ever mishear lyrics and when you learn what they’re really saying you’re like wow my version is 900% better

(via fjucking)


  • baby: m -m-m-
  • mom: meet me in the pit? mitachondria is the powerhouse of the cell?? makoto tachibana??? what?!?
  • baby: mom wtf

misterchekov:

reblog if your dick is longer than your arm

(via singmetosea)


nuttenviertel:

"du bist die liebe meines lebens,bitte lass die drogen,ich geh kaputt wenn du es tust! ich brauche dich"

nuttenviertel:

"du bist die liebe meines lebens,bitte lass die drogen,ich geh kaputt wenn du es tust! ich brauche dich"

(via germanlanguagerocks)


neoliberalismkills:

Do you ever get into an argument with someone and find yourself unable to speak for a moment because you’re just so blown away by how utterly wrong and ignorant the other person is being and you can’t understand how anyone could actually believe the things they are saying

(via bite-meee)



mcrude:

bagelbrother:

mcrude:

image

friendship

Or thirst

friendship

(via jidou-hanbai-ki)


“A common theme in these user-submitted signs is that the women don’t need feminism because they believe in living traditionally. Some specifically state that they are stay-at-home moms. One woman does not need feminism because she likes to cook for her family. On its surface, it’s pretty easy to understand where they’re coming from—you don’t hear a lot about feminists fighting for a woman’s right to cook for her family. But that’s because the option to cook for your family was always on the table (so to speak). Our feminist predecessors had that option, and they wanted more options—like to have job opportunities and to vote. You don’t give up one right when you gain another. The option to be a stay-at-home mom has always been there (if you can afford to live on one income and so forth). You’ve heard about suffragettes fighting for the right to vote because it was a big deal. You haven’t heard about suffragettes fighting for the right to be stay-at-home mothers, not because it’s frowned upon but because there wasn’t a need to vocalize support for the status quo. If someone tells you “your only meal option is beans,” you don’t need to stand up and demand beans. The beans are right there, beaning around in front of you.

However, if you want to talk about a group that has historically voiced support for families, and specifically mothers, of all types—including, yes, stay-at-home moms—we must, I’m sorry to say, talk about feminists. Here’s an incomplete list of mother or family-related issues that feminists have fought for: maternity leave, incarcerated women’s right to give birth without being in shackles, and basic rights for domestic workers. Women Against Feminism would point out that feminists don’t work toward the same rights for men, so what gives? Feminists do actually work toward things like paid paternity leave, for one thing. But similar to the point made by my incredibly insightful bean metaphor, men already, uh, have a lot of rights. That’s why you don’t hear about feminists pursuing them. Maybe if feminists do eventually start fighting harder for the rights of men, there could be a highly paid male executive, or hell, even a male president!”
Women Against Feminism Have a Strange Fixation on Opening Jars | VICE United States (via brutereason)

(via jidou-hanbai-ki)


Seite 1 von 8954